Idiopathic upper extremity deep vein thrombosis: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) management is controversial and ranges from anticoagulation alone to the addition of further interventions such as thrombolysis and decompressive surgery. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effects of anticoagulation alone compared to anticoagulation with additional interventions such as thrombolysis or decompressive surgery on the incidence of recurrent UEDVT and post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) in patients with idiopathic UEDVT (including those associated with the oral contraceptive pill). PATIENTS/METHODS: A systematic search was conducted for studies which focused on acute UEDVT treatment defined as therapies starting within 4 weeks of symptom onset. We limited studies to those that recruited 10 or more subjects and involved at least 6 weeks to 12 months anticoagulation alone or together with additional interventions with at least 6-month follow-up. Primary outcomes were symptomatic recurrent radiologically confirmed UEDVT and PTS. Secondary outcomes were symptomatic venous thromboembolism, bleeding and mortality. RESULTS: We found seven studies which reported recurrent UEDVT rates and five that reported PTS rates. All studies were retrospective or cross-sectional. None compared anticoagulation alone to anticoagulation with additional intervention. Study heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis and risk of bias was moderate to serious. Recurrent UEDVT occurred in 0% to 12% post-anticoagulation alone and 0% to 23% post-additional interventions. PTS rates varied from 4% to 32% without severe PTS. Only limited studies reported on our secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: There is limited evidence behind idiopathic UEDVT management. Prospective comparative studies in this area are essential.

Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis: Current Knowledge and Future Directions.

Upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) has been increasing in incidence due to the escalating use of central venous catheters such as peripherally inserted central catheters. UEDVT can be primary idiopathic or secondary to pacemaker leads, intravascular catheters or cancer. In comparison to conventional venous thromboembolism such as lower limb deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism the risk factors, investigations, and management are not well defined. We review current evidence in primary and secondary UEDVT, highlighting areas in need of further research. We also explore the entity of venous thoracic outlet syndrome, which is said to be a risk factor for recurrent primary UEDVT and is the rationale behind surgical interventions.

Venous thromboembolism in primary central nervous system lymphoma during frontline chemoimmunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: In primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), venous thromboembolism (VTE) can cause significant morbidity and hinder chemotherapy delivery. OBJECTIVES: To assess VTE incidence, timing and adequacy of inpatient and outpatient VTE prophylaxis in patients with PCNSL receiving chemoimmunotherapy with curative intent. PATIENTS/METHODS: We reviewed patients diagnosed with PCNSL between 1997 and 2018 who received methotrexate, procarbazine, and vincristine ± Rituximab. Patient demographics, VTE prophylaxis and incidence, adverse events of anticoagulation, and survival outcomes were collected. RESULTS: Fifty-one PCNSL patients were included (median 67 years [range, 32-87], 30 males [59%]). Thirteen patients (25%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 14-40) developed VTE at a median of 1.6 months from diagnosis (range, 0-4). Patients with Khorana Risk Score ≥2 were more likely to have VTE than those with a KRS < 2 (60% vs 15%; P = .01). Eighty-five percent had deviations from inpatient VTE prophylaxis guidelines, and outpatient prophylaxis was not routinely administered. Three patients required inferior vena cava filters. Hemorrhagic complications of anticoagulation included an intracranial hemorrhage from therapeutic anticoagulation and three cases of major bleeding from prophylactic anticoagulation. No patients died from VTE or its treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL are at high risk of VTE. Further research is required into optimal VTE prophylaxis in PCNSL.

DCEP as a bridge to ongoing therapies for advanced relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma.

There is limited data describing dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin (DCEP) in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We reviewed 65 patients with RRMM receiving DCEP between 2005 and 2017 in two Melbourne Hospitals. Patients had received a mean of three prior treatment lines (range, 1-11). The mean number of cycles of DCEP was two (range, 1-4). Overall response rate (ORR) was 55% whilst 19% achieved MR and SD. Median overall survival (OS) was 9.6 months. Those bridged to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) had significantly improved OS compared to those who were not (median 32.8 vs. 10.7 months, p=.0004). Significant treatment-related mortality (TRM) was observed (9.7%), mostly attributable to grade 3-4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. Mandatory use of G-CSF is, therefore, warranted to prevent septic complications. In heavily pretreated RRMM, DCEP is an effective bridge to definitive therapy but in the absence of the latter, its value is questionable.

Immune thrombocytopenic purpura associated with fingolimod.

Fingolimod is an oral sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator which causes lymphocyte sequestration in lymph nodes and is approved for relapsing multiple sclerosis. The Therapeutic Goods Administration of Australia is aware of only one case where fingolimod preceded immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) by 5 weeks. Here we report three such cases.None were on any medications known to cause ITP and routine investigations were unremarkable. All cases were treated with immunosuppression. Case 1 successfully weaned prednisolone after fingolimod cessation whereas case 2 weaned slowly while continuing fingolimod therapy. Case 3 had more refractory ITP and re-exposure to fingolimod worsened thrombocytopenia.There was a temporal association between fingolimod exposure and ITP however dose-effect association and pathogenesis remain less clear.In conclusion, our cases highlight that clinicians should be aware of the possible association between ITP and fingolimod.